Merrill Lynch

1. Given the changes that have occurred in theprivate client market made it even more suitable.
international capital markets during the pastThe bankruptcy of Yamaichi Securities in 1997
decade, does Merrill Lynch's strategy of expandingwas a perfect circumstance for American
internationally make sense? Why?company to start entering Japanese market.
In a couple past decades the world has become aThey first considered a joint venture that would
smaller place especially in the sense ofallow minimum spending as they had a chance to
communication and ability to conduct businessuse already existing distribution system of a
internationally. With the emergence of newknown Japanese bank. On the other side they
technologies managing and controlling has becomedidn't see their presence on the market due to
easier than ever before, thus allowing companiesthis venture in the long run thus they
to go global introducing their services andreconsidered this deal and were lucky to hire
products in various countries. Not only technicalworkers and buy Yamaichi's branch offices in
assistance gave such a rise to multinational1997. Merrill Lynch definitely won in this situation
businesses but also international policies ofwhen establishing their company's position on the
countries that were closed before for foreignmarket without reporting and coordinating their
investment. For instance countries such as Japanmoves with another Japanese company. The risk
and former Soviet Union have opened theirthey took when working on their own paid off
markets for big companies from the Unitedvery quickly and significantly to their benefit,
States and other economically developedregarding enormous value of the assets held by
countries.the company.
2. What factors make Japan a suitable market for4. The collapse in stock market values in 2001-02
Merrill Lynch to enter?resulted in Merrill Lynch's Japanese unit incurring
The fact of Merrill Lynch's leading position in thesignificant losses. In retrospect, was the Japanese
States and its acquisition of the leading mutualexpansion a costly blunder or did the company
funds companies of economical giants such assimply get hit by macroeconomic events that
Britain and Canada have made it possible at leastwere difficult to predict and avoid?
theoretically to enter Japanese market. On theThe years 2001-2002 were significant for all big
other hand it didn't consider national buyingbusinesses worldwide as global collapse of the
characteristics and regulations over financialstock markets occurred. This event can hardly be
service industry. However the removal of numberpredicted by anyone as it is caused by the
of restrictions and allowing Japanese people tomacroeconomic factors that are not controlled by
purchase foreign bonds and stock in the mid 1990a single country, and needles to say by a
had made Japanese market suitable for entrancecompany. Evidently predicting such an event
and establishment of foreign capital. Moreoverwould soften the crisis for Merrill Lynch however
their government understood the necessity ofcompletely avoiding it was impossible because
new "blood" in country's economy which would beinternational business is tightly connected with
donated by foreign companies to enhancemacroeconomic conditions as it was in this case.
competition and bring in more funds.Lay offs and closing of most of their retail
3. Review Merrill Lynch's 1997 reentry into thelocations was the only way company could
Japanese private client market. Pay close attentionmanage to survive and continue operating on the
to the timing and scale of entry and the nature ofJapanese market. Future showed that this decision
the strategic commitments Merrill Lynch is makingwas a smart one and led to renewing of
in Japan. What are the potential benefitscompany's power because almost all assets were
associated with this strategy? What are the costsstill controlled by the parent company.
and risks? Do you think the tradeoff between5. Do you think Merrill Lynch should continue in
benefits and risks and costs makes sense? Why?Japan? Why?
The first attempt of Merrill Lynch to enterAfter years of experience and success on the
Japanese market failed as their market was notJapanese market it would be not wise to
regulated to accept international players. In 1997withdraw now. Practice shows that this company
however the situation changed under the WTOwas able to withstand such tribulations as loss of
agreement for the better allowing foreign firms tohalf of their profit and huge lay off of workforce
sell financial services to their national investors.and still in less than six months they were up and
Regarding their previous experience they wererunning. Having loyal customers and knowledge of
hesitating to enter Japanese market but it wasspecifics of Japanese market structure are core
clear that this time things have changed with opencompetencies of Merrill Lynch as compared to
market and huge amount of assets owned byother players in this field. They definitely should
Japanese households were too attractive to misscontinue conducting business in Japan although
such opportunity. It was perfect timing for Merrillthey are not guaranteed to have it stable and
Lynch as there were only few other foreignflawless all the time, as 2001-2002 crisis has
competing companies and their prior experience inproved.