Welcome to Madison city resource


Weather Forecasting - A New Idea

Do you think better weather forecastingof the country? That could be determined by
requires a degree in meteorology? Maybe alooking at the statistics. Check the forecast
degree in statistical analysis would be morehighs and lows for the last 365 days, and
helpful. Consider this following new way tocheck the actual temperatures for those days.
forecast the weather with more accuracy andSee what the predicted probabilities of rain
less  knowledge.or  snow  were,  and  what actually happened.
Friday, February 2, 2007 - Canon City,Suppose that of the last 24 times a
Colorado. I brought in my Canon City Dailyforecaster predicted a 50% chance of rain, it
Record from the porch when it arrived, atactually rained 18 times. He may have the
about 3 in the afternoon. I opened thebest data, but he may be too conservative in
newspaper to the page with the weatherhow he uses it. Suppose this was not a fluke
forecast, wondering how cold it would be the- which can be determined by doing more
following  day.statistical analysis. You could know nothing
about weather forecasting and provide a more
The paper forecast a high temperature was 13accurate forecast simply by saying "A 75%
degrees Fahrenheit. I knew this was way toochance of rain tomorrow" every time he said
low. Forecasts on television and on thethere  was  a  50%  chance,  right?
internet said that we would reach 23 or 27
degrees the following day. I knew they wereThat's the basis for this new forecasting
also too low, and I told my wife it would bemodel. First gather the statistical
in the 30s at least. The actual highinformation on the forecasts of several
temperature the next day was 53 degreesweather forecasting services or
Fahrenheit.meteorologists. Compare this to the actual
weather that happened, and look for any
No, that's not a typo. The various weatherconsistencies in the inaccuracies. Then you
forecasting "experts" were off by as much ascreate a computer program. As you enter each
40 degrees - and that was for a simpleof these forecasts into it, they are adjusted
24-hour forecast. How could they be so farfor known tendencies. The result is a more
off? And how could I be better than them ataccurate  forecast.
forecasting  the  weather?
If Forecaster A has managed over the last
I can't answer the first question. Theyear to forecast a high that averages 4
weather here is more unpredictable than indegrees over the actual high, the computer
most places. Also, perhaps the meteorologistsadjusts for that. More sophisticated analysis
follow there computer models too slavishly,might show that Forecaster B is consistently
even when their experience and intuition tellpredicting a higher probability of rain than
them  to  adjust  the  forecast.there is in the fall, but a lower probability
of rain than there actually is in the spring.
However, I can answer the second question. MyThe computer can take this into account.
guess was closer because the forecasters wereFinally, it may work best if the adjusted
so consistent in the way they made theirforecasts of three or more sources are then
errors. Around this time, I remember countingaveraged.
something like 15 out of 20 days when all the
various weather forecasts predicted a highThere really is no need to know anything at
temperature that was 5 degrees or more tooall about weather forecasting. This is based
low. All I needed to do was take the higheston the idea that even when experts have all
temperature  forecast  and  add five degrees.the best knowledge and data, they sometimes
apply it incorrectly, and do so in consistent
A  New  Weather  Forecasting  Modelways. Don't be surprised if some television
stations get rid of their meteorologists and
Consistency in their errors was the key to mytake advantage of this new weather
success. They weren't forecasting too highforecasting  idea.
one day and too low the next. They were wrong
in  the  same  ways  over  and  over."Now your electronic weather forecast, from
our Statistical Analysis Weather Machine.
Are the errors as consistent in other parts



1 A B C D E 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126