Weather Forecasting - A New Idea

Do you think better weather forecasting requiresthe statistics. Check the forecast highs and lows
a degree in meteorology? Maybe a degree infor the last 365 days, and check the actual
statistical analysis would be more helpful. Considertemperatures for those days. See what the
this following new way to forecast the weatherpredicted probabilities of rain or snow were, and
with more accuracy and less knowledge.what actually happened.
Friday, February 2, 2007 - Canon City, Colorado. ISuppose that of the last 24 times a forecaster
brought in my Canon City Daily Record from thepredicted a 50% chance of rain, it actually rained
porch when it arrived, at about 3 in the afternoon.18 times. He may have the best data, but he
I opened the newspaper to the page with themay be too conservative in how he uses it.
weather forecast, wondering how cold it would beSuppose this was not a fluke - which can be
the following day.determined by doing more statistical analysis. You
The paper forecast a high temperature was 13could know nothing about weather forecasting
degrees Fahrenheit. I knew this was way too low.and provide a more accurate forecast simply by
Forecasts on television and on the internet saidsaying "A 75% chance of rain tomorrow" every
that we would reach 23 or 27 degrees thetime he said there was a 50% chance, right?
following day. I knew they were also too low, andThat's the basis for this new forecasting model.
I told my wife it would be in the 30s at least. TheFirst gather the statistical information on the
actual high temperature the next day was 53forecasts of several weather forecasting services
degrees Fahrenheit.or meteorologists. Compare this to the actual
No, that's not a typo. The various weatherweather that happened, and look for any
forecasting "experts" were off by as much as 40consistencies in the inaccuracies. Then you create
degrees - and that was for a simple 24-houra computer program. As you enter each of these
forecast. How could they be so far off? And howforecasts into it, they are adjusted for known
could I be better than them at forecasting thetendencies. The result is a more accurate
weather?forecast.
I can't answer the first question. The weatherIf Forecaster A has managed over the last year
here is more unpredictable than in most places.to forecast a high that averages 4 degrees over
Also, perhaps the meteorologists follow therethe actual high, the computer adjusts for that.
computer models too slavishly, even when theirMore sophisticated analysis might show that
experience and intuition tell them to adjust theForecaster B is consistently predicting a higher
forecast.probability of rain than there is in the fall, but a
However, I can answer the second question. Mylower probability of rain than there actually is in
guess was closer because the forecasters werethe spring. The computer can take this into
so consistent in the way they made their errors.account. Finally, it may work best if the adjusted
Around this time, I remember counting somethingforecasts of three or more sources are then
like 15 out of 20 days when all the variousaveraged.
weather forecasts predicted a high temperatureThere really is no need to know anything at all
that was 5 degrees or more too low. All I neededabout weather forecasting. This is based on the
to do was take the highest temperature forecastidea that even when experts have all the best
and add five degrees.knowledge and data, they sometimes apply it
A New Weather Forecasting Modelincorrectly, and do so in consistent ways. Don't be
Consistency in their errors was the key to mysurprised if some television stations get rid of
success. They weren't forecasting too high onetheir meteorologists and take advantage of this
day and too low the next. They were wrong innew weather forecasting idea.
the same ways over and over."Now your electronic weather forecast, from our
Are the errors as consistent in other parts of theStatistical Analysis Weather Machine.
country? That could be determined by looking at